<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Friday Links</title> <atom:link href="/2010/09/friday-links-3.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://genomesunzipped.org/2010/09/friday-links-3.php</link> <description>public personal genomics</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5</generator> <item><title>By: AMac</title><link>https://genomesunzipped.org/2010/09/friday-links-3.php#comment-4279</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[AMac]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">https://genomesunzipped.org/?p=960#comment-4279</guid> <description><![CDATA[By coincidence, that PLoS Genetics paper on sequencing comes from the lab of... David Goldstein (synthetic association).
The figure of 165 homozygous protein-truncating variants per average genome seems awfully high.  Indeed, the text indicates that the &quot;real&quot; number is probably rather lower, due to things like the inadvertent consideration of pseudogenes.  But it would still be pretty high, say over 100.  If there are 20,000 translated genes, that&#039;s 1 in 200!  The simplest cocktail-napkin calculation would then suggest that ~7% of translated autosomal genes are expressed by only one allele.  Again, a non-intuitively high figure--especially considering the dosage effects of one-allele expression of some genes, famously BRCA1 and BRCA2.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By coincidence, that PLoS Genetics paper on sequencing comes from the lab of&#8230; David Goldstein (synthetic association).</p><p>The figure of 165 homozygous protein-truncating variants per average genome seems awfully high.  Indeed, the text indicates that the &#8220;real&#8221; number is probably rather lower, due to things like the inadvertent consideration of pseudogenes.  But it would still be pretty high, say over 100.  If there are 20,000 translated genes, that&#8217;s 1 in 200!  The simplest cocktail-napkin calculation would then suggest that ~7% of translated autosomal genes are expressed by only one allele.  Again, a non-intuitively high figure&#8211;especially considering the dosage effects of one-allele expression of some genes, famously BRCA1 and BRCA2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Pickrell</title><link>https://genomesunzipped.org/2010/09/friday-links-3.php#comment-4273</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pickrell]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">https://genomesunzipped.org/?p=960#comment-4273</guid> <description><![CDATA[Note the incorrect interpretation of p-values in the Guardian piece:
&lt;i&gt;Consider one of the more reliable associations between genes and behaviour: a gene known as KIAA0319 which has been found to relate to reading ability in several different samples. In one study, an overall association was reported with a p value of 0.0001, indicating that the likelihood of the association being a fluke is 1 in 10,000. &lt;/i&gt;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the incorrect interpretation of p-values in the Guardian piece:</p><p><i>Consider one of the more reliable associations between genes and behaviour: a gene known as KIAA0319 which has been found to relate to reading ability in several different samples. In one study, an overall association was reported with a p value of 0.0001, indicating that the likelihood of the association being a fluke is 1 in 10,000. </i></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luke Jostins</title><link>https://genomesunzipped.org/2010/09/friday-links-3.php#comment-4271</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke Jostins]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">https://genomesunzipped.org/?p=960#comment-4271</guid> <description><![CDATA[Meh, if we congratulated you every time your name appears on a GWAS paper we wouldn&#039;t get much else done.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, if we congratulated you every time your name appears on a GWAS paper we wouldn&#8217;t get much else done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Barrett</title><link>https://genomesunzipped.org/2010/09/friday-links-3.php#comment-4268</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Barrett]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:25:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">https://genomesunzipped.org/?p=960#comment-4268</guid> <description><![CDATA[You might also notice that Genomes Unzipped&#039;s very own Jeffrey C Barrett is on the migraine paper. :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also notice that Genomes Unzipped&#8217;s very own Jeffrey C Barrett is on the migraine paper. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>